resolver: don't depend on v4mapped ipv6 to probe routability of v4 addrs

to produce sorted results roughly corresponding to RFC 3484/6724,
__lookup_name computes routability and choice of source address via
dummy UDP connect operations (which do not produce any packets). since
at the logical level, the properties fed into the sort key are
computed on ipv6 addresses, the code was written to use the v4mapped
ipv6 form of ipv4 addresses and share a common code path for them all.
however, on kernels where ipv6 support has been completely omitted,
this causes ipv4 to appear equally unroutable as ipv6, thereby putting
unreachable ipv6 addresses before ipv4 addresses in the results.

instead, use only ipv4 sockets to compute routability for ipv4
addresses. some gratuitous conversion back and forth is left so that
the logic is not affected by these changes. it may be possible to
simplify the ipv4 case considerably, thereby reducing code size and
complexity.

src/network/lookup_name.c

@@ -355,36 +355,53 @@ int __lookup_name(struct address buf[static MAXADDRS], char canon[static 256], c
 	 * excessive runtime and code size cost and dubious benefit.
 	 * So far the label/precedence table cannot be customized. */
 	for (i=0; i<cnt; i++) {
+		int family = buf[i].family;
 		int key = 0;
-		struct sockaddr_in6 sa, da = {
+		struct sockaddr_in6 sa6 = { 0 }, da6 = {
 			.sin6_family = AF_INET6,
 			.sin6_scope_id = buf[i].scopeid,
 			.sin6_port = 65535
 		};
-		if (buf[i].family == AF_INET6) {
-			memcpy(da.sin6_addr.s6_addr, buf[i].addr, 16);
+		struct sockaddr_in sa4 = { 0 }, da4 = {
+			.sin_family = AF_INET,
+			.sin_port = 65535
+		};
+		void *sa, *da;
+		socklen_t salen, dalen;
+		if (family == AF_INET6) {
+			memcpy(da6.sin6_addr.s6_addr, buf[i].addr, 16);
+			da = &da6; dalen = sizeof da6;
+			sa = &sa6; salen = sizeof sa6;
 		} else {
-			memcpy(da.sin6_addr.s6_addr,
+			memcpy(sa6.sin6_addr.s6_addr,
+				"\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\xff\xff", 12);
+			memcpy(da6.sin6_addr.s6_addr+12, buf[i].addr, 4);
+			memcpy(da6.sin6_addr.s6_addr,
 				"\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\xff\xff", 12);
-			memcpy(da.sin6_addr.s6_addr+12, buf[i].addr, 4);
+			memcpy(da6.sin6_addr.s6_addr+12, buf[i].addr, 4);
+			memcpy(&da4.sin_addr, buf[i].addr, 4);
+			da = &da4; dalen = sizeof da4;
+			sa = &sa4; salen = sizeof sa4;
 		}
-		const struct policy *dpolicy = policyof(&da.sin6_addr);
-		int dscope = scopeof(&da.sin6_addr);
+		const struct policy *dpolicy = policyof(&da6.sin6_addr);
+		int dscope = scopeof(&da6.sin6_addr);
 		int dlabel = dpolicy->label;
 		int dprec = dpolicy->prec;
 		int prefixlen = 0;
-		int fd = socket(AF_INET6, SOCK_DGRAM|SOCK_CLOEXEC, IPPROTO_UDP);
+		int fd = socket(family, SOCK_DGRAM|SOCK_CLOEXEC, IPPROTO_UDP);
 		if (fd >= 0) {
-			if (!connect(fd, (void *)&da, sizeof da)) {
+			if (!connect(fd, da, dalen)) {
 				key |= DAS_USABLE;
-				if (!getsockname(fd, (void *)&sa,
-				    &(socklen_t){sizeof sa})) {
-					if (dscope == scopeof(&sa.sin6_addr))
+				if (!getsockname(fd, sa, &salen)) {
+					if (family == AF_INET) memcpy(
+						&sa6.sin6_addr.s6_addr+12,
+						&sa4.sin_addr, 4);
+					if (dscope == scopeof(&sa6.sin6_addr))
 						key |= DAS_MATCHINGSCOPE;
-					if (dlabel == labelof(&sa.sin6_addr))
+					if (dlabel == labelof(&sa6.sin6_addr))
 						key |= DAS_MATCHINGLABEL;
-					prefixlen = prefixmatch(&sa.sin6_addr,
-						&da.sin6_addr);
+					prefixlen = prefixmatch(&sa6.sin6_addr,
+						&da6.sin6_addr);
 				}
 			}
 			close(fd);