this agrees with implementation practice on glibc and BSD systems, and is the const-correct way to do things; it eliminates warnings from passing pointers to const. the prototype without const came from seemingly erroneous man pages.
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ typedef struct {
const char *dli_sname;
void *dli_saddr;
} Dl_info;
-int dladdr(void *, Dl_info *);
+int dladdr(const void *, Dl_info *);
int dlinfo(void *, int, void *);
#endif
@@ -1,9 +1,9 @@
#define _GNU_SOURCE
#include <dlfcn.h>
-int __dladdr(void *, Dl_info *);
+int __dladdr(const void *, Dl_info *);
-int dladdr(void *addr, Dl_info *info)
+int dladdr(const void *addr, Dl_info *info)
{
return __dladdr(addr, info);
}
@@ -1331,7 +1331,7 @@ failed:
return 0;
-int __dladdr(void *addr, Dl_info *info)
+int __dladdr(const void *addr, Dl_info *info)
struct dso *p;
Sym *sym;
@@ -1441,7 +1441,7 @@ void *__dlsym(void *restrict p, const char *restrict s, void *restrict ra)
-int __dladdr (void *addr, Dl_info *info)
+int __dladdr (const void *addr, Dl_info *info)