浏览代码

revert regex "cleanup" that seems unjustified and may break backtracking

it's not clear to me at the moment whether the code that was removed
(and which is now being re-added) is needed, but it's far from being a
no-op, and i don't want to risk breaking regex in this release.
Rich Felker 12 年之前
父节点
当前提交
ae4b0b96d6
共有 1 个文件被更改,包括 3 次插入0 次删除
  1. 3 0
      src/regex/regexec.c

+ 3 - 0
src/regex/regexec.c

@@ -596,6 +596,7 @@ tre_tnfa_run_backtrack(const tre_tnfa_t *tnfa, const void *string,
      started from. */
   int next_c_start;
   const char *str_byte_start;
+  int pos_start = -1;
 #ifdef TRE_MBSTATE
   mbstate_t mbstate_start;
 #endif /* TRE_MBSTATE */
@@ -675,7 +676,9 @@ tre_tnfa_run_backtrack(const tre_tnfa_t *tnfa, const void *string,
   }
 
   state = NULL;
+  pos = pos_start;
   GET_NEXT_WCHAR();
+  pos_start = pos;
   next_c_start = next_c;
   str_byte_start = str_byte;
 #ifdef TRE_MBSTATE