this could lead to spurious failures of wide printf functions
@@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ static int wprintf_core(FILE *f, const wchar_t *fmt, va_list *ap, union arg *nl_
case 's':
bs = arg.p;
if (p<0) p = INT_MAX;
- for (l=0; l<p && (i=mbtowc(&wc, bs, MB_LEN_MAX))>0; bs+=i, l++);
+ for (i=l=0; l<p && (i=mbtowc(&wc, bs, MB_LEN_MAX))>0; bs+=i, l++);
if (i<0) return -1;
p=l;
if (w<p) w=p;